---

Quick Definition

GitLab CI is the continuous integration and continuous delivery component built into GitLab that automates build, test, and deployment pipelines for code changes.

Analogy: GitLab CI is like an automated assembly line in a factory where raw material (code) moves through quality checks and packaging (builds, tests, deploys) with gates that stop defective products.

Formal technical line: GitLab CI is a pipeline orchestration system driven by .gitlab-ci.yml that schedules jobs on runners, manages artifacts and environments, and integrates with GitLab’s SCM, permissions, and issue tracking.

Multiple meanings:

• The most common meaning: the CI/CD service inside GitLab for pipeline automation.
• Other uses:
• Local shorthand for a pipeline job definition file (.gitlab-ci.yml).
• Reference to GitLab Runner in casual conversation.
• Sometimes used to describe the broader GitLab DevOps toolchain.

---

What is GitLab CI?

What it is / what it is NOT

• What it is: An integrated CI/CD automation engine tightly coupled to GitLab repositories, supporting pipeline definitions, job execution, artifact handling, environment deployments, and basic release workflows.
• What it is NOT: A complete replacement for full-featured orchestration platforms, specialized deployment systems, or an observability stack. It orchestrates jobs but does not, by itself, provide full-fledged monitoring, advanced security scanning beyond available integrations, nor a general-purpose container scheduler.

Key properties and constraints

• Declarative pipeline config via .gitlab-ci.yml stored in repo.
• Uses GitLab Runners (shared or self-hosted) to execute jobs.
• Job isolation through executors like Docker, shell, Kubernetes, or custom.
• Artifacts and caching support for build inputs/outputs.
• Environments, deployments, and feature flags integrated at a basic level.
• Permissions and pipeline policies are enforced through GitLab’s RBAC and protected branches.
• Scaling depends on runner capacity and orchestration choices (Kubernetes autoscaling recommended for cloud scale).
• Security posture depends on pipeline configuration, runner isolation, secrets handling, and integrations.

Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows

• Source control trigger for pipelines after merge/push.
• CI for unit/integration tests and static checks.
• CD for publishing artifacts, container images, and applying infra changes (Terraform, kubectl, cloud CLIs).
• Integration point for security scanning (SAST/DAST), license scanning, and dependency scanning.
• Works with observability stacks via artifact upload, metrics emission, or side-channel integrations.
• Useful in GitOps patterns when used to update Git ops repos or invoke controllers.

Diagram description (text-only for visualization)

• Developer pushes to Git repository -> GitLab detects change -> Pipeline controller reads .gitlab-ci.yml -> Scheduler queues jobs -> Runner pool picks jobs -> Jobs run in isolated executors -> Jobs produce artifacts and statuses -> Deploy jobs update environments or push images to registry -> GitLab updates merge request and environment status -> Monitoring and alerts consume telemetry from deployed apps.

GitLab CI in one sentence

GitLab CI is the in-repository pipeline engine that automates build, test, and deploy workflows using .gitlab-ci.yml and GitLab Runners, tightly integrated with GitLab’s SCM and permissions.

GitLab CI vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Term	How it differs from GitLab CI	Common confusion
T1	GitLab Runner	Executes pipeline jobs for GitLab CI	Called GitLab CI interchangeably
T2	.gitlab-ci.yml	Pipeline configuration file read by GitLab CI	People call file GitLab CI
T3	GitLab Pipelines	The sequence of jobs executed by GitLab CI	Often used as synonym for GitLab CI
T4	GitLab CI/CD	Broader term including CI and CD features in GitLab	Some use it only for CI or only CD
T5	GitHub Actions	CI/CD from a different vendor	Confused as interchangeable with GitLab CI
T6	Kubernetes CI runners	Runners that use Kubernetes as executor	Called GitLab CI cluster sometimes
T7	GitOps controller	Pushes deploy manifests from repo to cluster	People confuse GitLab CI deploy with GitOps

Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)

---

Why does GitLab CI matter?

Business impact

• Revenue: Faster, reliable releases shorten lead time to features that generate revenue and reduce time-to-fix.
• Trust: Consistent pipelines improve release predictability and reduce regressions that erode customer trust.
• Risk: Automated checks reduce the probability of shipping critical vulnerabilities or breaking changes.

Engineering impact

• Incident reduction: Automated pre-merge tests and gated deployments typically reduce production incidents by catching regressions earlier.
• Velocity: Reproducible pipelines and artifact caching reduce developer context switches and shorten feedback loops.
• Technical debt: Enforcing linting, tests, and dependency scans decreases long-term maintenance cost if enforced consistently.

SRE framing

• SLIs/SLOs: Pipeline success rate and deployment lead time can be SLIs supporting service-level objectives for delivery reliability.
• Error budgets: Use deployment failure and rollback rates against an error budget that limits risky release frequency.
• Toil: Automate repetitive steps (environment bootstrap, smoke tests, rollbacks) to reduce toil for on-call engineers.
• On-call: Deploys and pipeline failures should surface to on-call with clear runbooks.

What commonly breaks in production

• Misconfigured secrets leading to failed deployments or leaked credentials.
• Flaky tests that pass in CI but fail in production due to environmental mismatch.
• Race conditions when parallel jobs change shared resources like databases or infra.
• Missing artifact versioning causing consumers to pull wrong images.
• Insufficient runner isolation exposing hosts to build-time attacks.

---

Where is GitLab CI used? (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Layer/Area	How GitLab CI appears	Typical telemetry	Common tools
L1	Edge	Deploys CDN config or edge lambdas	Deploy success rate and latency	CDN CLI, Terraform
L2	Network	Automation of infra changes	Change failures and drift detection	Terraform, Ansible
L3	Service	Build and deploy microservices	Build times and deployment lead	Docker, Helm
L4	Application	Run tests and package artifacts	Test pass rate and coverage	Test frameworks, npm
L5	Data	ETL job CI and schema migrations	Job success rate and runtime	Airflow, db migration tools
L6	IaaS/PaaS/SaaS	Provisioning via cloud CLIs	Provision success and time	AWS CLI, GCP CLI
L7	Kubernetes	Runners as pods and helm deploys	Pod startup and deploy success	kubectl, Helm
L8	Serverless	Deploy functions or serverless infra	Cold start and invocation errors	Serverless frameworks
L9	CI/CD Ops	Pipeline scheduling and runner health	Queue length and job wait time	GitLab Runners
L10	Observability	CI emits metrics and artifacts	Pipeline metrics and logs	Prometheus

Row Details (only if needed)

• L1: Use for CDN config changes and edge function rollouts.
• L2: Runs IaC plans and applies with approvals.
• L3: Builds containers, runs tests, and deploys to service clusters.
• L4: Executes unit and integration tests, packages releases.
• L5: Validates migrations in CI and runs small ETL smoke jobs.
• L6: Automates cloud account provisioning and role setup.
• L7: Uses Kubernetes executor for scaling runners as pods.
• L8: Deploys serverless artifacts to managed platforms.
• L9: Monitors runner pools and schedules recurring pipelines.
• L10: Uploads coverage reports and artifacts for observability.

---

When should you use GitLab CI?

When it’s necessary

• You host code in GitLab and need integrated pipeline automation.
• You require tight integration with merge requests, protected branches, and repository-level permissions.
• You need a single-pane developer experience for code, CI, and issues.

When it’s optional

• Small scripts that rarely change and can be deployed manually for internal tools.
• When an organization already uses another CI/CD tuned for specialized workloads and migration cost outweighs benefits.
• For extremely high-throughput multi-tenant builds where dedicated orchestration may be more efficient.

When NOT to use / overuse it

• Do not make GitLab CI the sole place for long-running stateful workloads; it is tailored for short-lived jobs.
• Avoid embedding secrets or production credentials directly in jobs instead of using a secrets manager.
• Avoid overloading pipelines with unnecessary heavy integration tests that could run in a separate stage or environment.

Decision checklist

• If you host code in GitLab and need end-to-end automation -> Use GitLab CI.
• If you need GitOps-managed cluster state and want GitLab to update repo -> Use GitLab CI to update GitOps repo, but rely on controllers to reconcile.
• If you need ephemeral, heavy compute isolation -> Prefer Kubernetes executor with autoscaling or external runners with strong isolation.

Maturity ladder

• Beginner: Single .gitlab-ci.yml with build, test, and deploy to a single environment; single shared runner.
• Intermediate: Multiple pipelines (merge-request, scheduled), caching, artifact registries, protected environments, and branch policies.
• Advanced: Dynamic child pipelines, CI templates across projects, Kubernetes auto-scaling runners, policy-as-code, GitOps, approval gates, and SLO-driven deployments.

Example decisions

• Small team example: If team size <= 6 and release cadence is weekly, use shared GitLab runners and simple pipelines with basic branching rules.
• Large enterprise example: If multiple teams deploy to production daily and regulatory controls exist, use self-hosted runners in dedicated VPC, enforce pipeline policies, use protected environments, and integrate with secret management and audit logging.

---

How does GitLab CI work?

Components and workflow

1. Repository change triggers: push, merge request, schedule, API call.
2. GitLab pipeline scheduler reads .gitlab-ci.yml and creates pipeline object.
3. Jobs defined in stages are enqueued.
4. GitLab Runner requests jobs from the coordinator and executes them using an executor (Docker, shell, Kubernetes, etc.).
5. Job runs, produces logs, artifacts, caches, and exit code.
6. GitLab updates pipeline status; failing jobs halt pipeline unless configured to allow_failure.
7. Successful artifacts can be passed to downstream jobs or deployed to environments/registries.
8. Deploy steps update environments and optionally notify monitoring and release tracking.

Data flow and lifecycle

• Source code -> Pipeline config (.gitlab-ci.yml) -> Job triggers -> Runner execution -> Artifacts stored in object storage or registry -> Environments updated -> Pipeline metadata stored in GitLab DB and events emitted to integrations.

Edge cases and failure modes

• Stalled queue due to insufficient runners.
• Jobs access secrets incorrectly causing failures or exposures.
• Artifact retention misconfigured leading to missing artifacts for downstream jobs.
• Network restrictions block runners from accessing external registries.
• Flaky tests creating intermittent pipeline failures.

Short practical example (pseudocode)

• In repo: define .gitlab-ci.yml with stages: build, test, deploy.
• Runner config: install GitLab Runner, register with token, set executor to docker or kubernetes.
• Pipeline: push to feature branch -> merge request pipeline runs tests -> approval -> deploy stage runs helm upgrade.

Typical architecture patterns for GitLab CI

1. Shared runner pool – When to use: Small teams or proof-of-concept. – Pros: Low maintenance. – Cons: No tenant isolation.

2. Self-hosted runners per team (VM or container) – When to use: Teams needing isolation or custom tooling. – Pros: Security and specialization. – Cons: Maintenance overhead.

3. Kubernetes executor with autoscaling – When to use: Cloud-native at scale. – Pros: Elastic capacity, ephemeral isolation. – Cons: Complex cluster configuration.

4. Runner fleet in private VPC with NAT – When to use: Secure access to internal resources. – Pros: Access to internal services, compliance control. – Cons: Requires networking and IAM management.

5. GitOps pipeline model – When to use: Declarative infra and automated reconciliation. – Pros: Clear audit trail and rollback via Git. – Cons: Requires controllers and additional reconciler tooling.

6. Hybrid model (cloud runners + specialized on-prem) – When to use: Mixed workloads and regulatory constraints. – Pros: Flexibility. – Cons: Complexity in routing jobs to correct runners.

Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Failure mode	Symptom	Likely cause	Mitigation	Observability signal
F1	Jobs stuck in pending	Pipeline shows pending for long	No available runners or tags mismatch	Add runners or fix tags	Queue length metric
F2	Runner resource exhaustion	Slow job startup and timeouts	Too many concurrent builds	Autoscale runners or throttle concurrency	Runner CPU and memory
F3	Artifact not found	Downstream job fails to fetch artifact	Misconfigured paths or retention	Verify artifact paths and retention	Artifact upload success rate
F4	Secrets leaked in logs	Sensitive values printed in job logs	Secrets not masked or env echoed	Use secret variables and mask	Unexpected secret exposure alerts
F5	Flaky tests	Intermittent pipeline failures	Non-deterministic tests or environment	Isolate tests and add retries	Test failure rate by test id
F6	Network timeout	Job cannot pull images	Registry access or firewall issue	Ensure network routes and auth	External call error counts
F7	Deployment rollback loop	Repeated deploy/rollback	Health checks failing or misconfigured probes	Fix health checks and pre-deploy tests	Deployment success ratio
F8	Long-running job cost spike	Unexpected infra costs	Heavy tasks in CI not optimized	Move heavy tasks to scheduled jobs	Cost per pipeline

Row Details (only if needed)

• F1: Check runner tags and group-level runners to ensure matching tags; verify runner online status.
• F2: Configure runner autoscaler with reasonable scale limits; set concurrency limits in runner config.
• F3: Confirm artifacts:paths and job names; check artifact expire_in settings.
• F4: Set variable masking, remove echo of secrets, use vault integrations.
• F5: Move flaky tests to separate stage with retries and investigate root cause.
• F6: Ensure runners have egress to registries, add VPC endpoints or proper firewall rules.
• F7: Add pre-deploy smoke tests and health checks; implement canary strategy.
• F8: Profile pipeline steps and cache dependencies; offload long tasks to dedicated CI runners or scheduled jobs.

---

Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for GitLab CI

Note: Each entry formatted as Term — definition — why it matters — common pitfall.

1. .gitlab-ci.yml — Pipeline declarative config file — Source of truth for pipelines — Misplaced indentation or syntax errors break pipelines
2. Job — Unit of work in a pipeline — Defines script and runtime — Overlong jobs cause slow pipelines
3. Stage — Grouping of jobs by execution phase — Controls ordering — Misunderstood ordering causes unexpected parallelism
4. Pipeline — Ordered execution of stages — Represents CI run for a commit — Complex pipelines are harder to debug
5. Runner — Agent that executes jobs — Provides executors and isolation — Unsecured runners can be attack vectors
6. Executor — Runtime for a job (docker,shell,kubernetes) — Determines isolation model — Wrong executor affects reproducibility
7. Shared runner — Runner available to multiple projects — Low maintenance — No tenant isolation
8. Specific runner — Runner configured per project or group — Security and customization — Requires admin management
9. Artifact — Output of a job stored for downstream consumption — Enables downstream reuse — Forgotten artifacts are lost due to expiry
10. Cache — Speed up builds by reusing dependencies — Reduces build time — Cache keys misconfigured lead to cache misses
11. Variables — Environment variables used in jobs — Secrets and configuration — Storing secrets plainly is insecure
12. Masked variables — Hidden in job logs — Protects secrets — Masking fails for long values or dynamic prints
13. Protected branch — Branch requiring special permissions — Prevents unauthorized deployments — Overuse can slow development
14. Protected variables — Only available to protected branches — Prevents leakage — Can block legitimate CI tasks on unprotected branches
15. Artifacts:expire_in — Artifact retention configuration — Controls storage costs — Too short causes missing artifacts
16. Retry — Job retry policy for flaky jobs — Improves reliability — Hides flakiness if overused
17. Allow_failure — Lets job fail without failing pipeline — Useful for optional checks — Can mask real issues
18. Pipeline triggers — API/webhook to start pipeline — Used for scheduled or external triggers — Misuse can lead to uncontrolled runs
19. Parent/child pipelines — Dynamic pipeline composition — Organize complex workflows — Adds complexity to observability
20. DAG — Directed acyclic graph for job dependencies — Enables parallelism and dependency control — Incorrect dependencies lead to ordering errors
21. Artifacts:reports — Structured reports (coverage, test reports) — Integrates with GitLab UI — Wrong format prevents rendering
22. Environments — Deploy targets with lifecycle — Shows deployments and environments — Not using environments hides deployment status
23. Review apps — Temporary environments per MR — Useful for preview — Costly if not cleaned up
24. Kubernetes executor — Runner that spawns pods — Scales with cluster — Requires cluster permissions and setup
25. Helm deploy — Using Helm charts in deploy jobs — Standardized Kubernetes releases — Chart misconfiguration causes rollout problems
26. Docker-in-Docker (DinD) — Building Docker images inside CI — Useful for image builds — Security and performance concerns
27. Container registry — Stores built images — Integral for deployments — Unauthenticated access compromises security
28. GitLab Pages — Static site hosting from CI — Useful for docs and demos — Improper caching can serve stale content
29. CI/CD templates — Reusable pipeline snippets — Reduce duplication — Over-abstraction hides logic
30. Security scanning — SAST/DAST integrated scans — Early vulnerability detection — False positives require triage
31. Dependency scanning — Detect vulnerable dependencies — Reduces supply-chain risk — Alerts can be noisy
32. Auto DevOps — Prebuilt pipeline features — Quick start for many apps — Not optimal for bespoke workloads
33. Pipeline quotas — Limits on concurrent pipelines — Protects resources — Overly restrictive slows development
34. Runner authentication token — Registers runner with GitLab — Required for job pickup — Token leakage compromises runners
35. Autoscaling runners — Dynamically scale runner fleet — Cost-efficient at scale — Needs tuning for burst patterns
36. GitLab CI minutes — Metering unit for hosted runners — Important for cost control — Misestimates lead to cost surprises
37. Release job — Job that creates a release artifact — Controls versioning — Manual vs automated release confusion
38. Canary deployment — Gradual rollout strategy — Reduces risk — Requires traffic routing and observability
39. Rollback — Revert to previous version — Safety net for bad releases — Requires fast artifact retrieval
40. Feature flags — Toggle features without deploy — Enables progressive release — Flags unmanaged create tech debt
41. Audit logs — Tracks pipeline and job actions — Useful for compliance — Not always enabled in all tiers
42. Runner tags — Labels to match jobs with runners — Control where jobs run — Missing tags cause pending jobs
43. Exit codes — Job success/failure indicator — Signals pipeline status — Ignoring non-zero exit code masks failures
44. Job artifacts expire — Storage lifecycle — Controls cost — Unexpected expiry breaks downstream jobs
45. Job logs — Execution logs for debugging — Primary observability for CI issues — Large logs obscure meaningful info

---

How to Measure GitLab CI (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Metric/SLI	What it tells you	How to measure	Starting target	Gotchas
M1	Pipeline success rate	Overall pipeline health	Successful pipelines / total	95%	Flaky tests skew results
M2	Mean time to merge	Time from MR open to merge	Avg MR duration	Varies / depends	Varies by team process
M3	Deployment lead time	Time from commit to prod	Time between commit and deploy success	< 1 day for fast teams	Long pipelines inflate metric
M4	Job queue time	Time jobs wait before start	Avg queue wait	< 2 min	Runner scarcity increases this
M5	Job execution time	Duration of job runs	Avg job runtime	Varies by job	Caching and parallelism affect it
M6	Runner utilization	Resource use per runner	CPU/memory usage vs capacity	40-70%	Overprovisioning or singletons distort
M7	Artifact retrieval failures	Downstream job errors fetching artifacts	Failure count	Low (near 0)	Expiry and path issues
M8	Secret exposure events	Detected prints of secrets in logs	Count of masked variable leaks	0	Hard to detect without scanning
M9	Deployment failure rate	Fraction of deployments that fail	Failed deploys / total	< 5%	Health checks must reflect real failures
M10	Time to rollback	Time from failure to rollback completion	Avg rollback time	< 15 min	Manual rollback increases this
M11	Cost per pipeline	Infrastructure cost per pipeline run	Sum infra cost / pipeline	Varies	Heavy jobs cause spikes
M12	Flaky test rate	Tests failing intermittently	Failing once then passing	< 2%	Test selection bias
M13	Merge request pipeline coverage	Percent of MRs with pipelines	Count of MRs with pipeline / total	100% on protected branches	Skipping pipelines for docs skews metric
M14	Security scan coverage	Percent of pipelines running scans	Count of scanned pipelines / total	80%	Scans increase runtime and noise
M15	Time to detect pipeline failure	From job fail to alert	Avg detection time	< 5 min	Missing alerts or logging delays

Row Details (only if needed)

• M2: Define what processes count as “merge” (automated vs manual approvals).
• M3: Include gate times like approvals and manual checks to be realistic.
• M11: Use cloud cost allocation tags and runner billing to compute.

Best tools to measure GitLab CI

Tool — Prometheus

• What it measures for GitLab CI: Runner metrics, pipeline durations, job queue lengths.
• Best-fit environment: Kubernetes executor or self-hosted runners.
• Setup outline:
• Export runner metrics via GitLab Runner exporter.
• Scrape metrics in Prometheus.
• Create recording rules for latency and errors.
• Use Prometheus Alertmanager for alerts.
• Strengths:
• Flexible time series and powerful queries.
• Native ecosystem with Grafana.
• Limitations:
• Needs storage and scale planning.
• Long-term retention requires remote storage.

Tool — Grafana

• What it measures for GitLab CI: Dashboards and visualizations for Prometheus metrics and logs.
• Best-fit environment: Any environment with compatible metric source.
• Setup outline:
• Connect to Prometheus and other datasources.
• Build dashboards for pipeline health, runner utilization.
• Enable alerts via Grafana or Alertmanager.
• Strengths:
• Rich visualization and sharing.
• Templated dashboards for quick onboarding.
• Limitations:
• Alerting less powerful without Alertmanager integration.
• Requires curation to avoid noisy dashboards.

Tool — ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana)

• What it measures for GitLab CI: Job logs, artifact metadata, runner logs.
• Best-fit environment: Centralized logging architecture.
• Setup outline:
• Ship job and runner logs to ELK.
• Index and create dashboards for job failures.
• Use alerting plugins for critical errors.
• Strengths:
• Text search and log correlation.
• Good for root cause analysis.
• Limitations:
• Index cost and sizing complexity.
• Requires parsing and normalization.

Tool — Cloud cost monitoring (Cloud provider or third-party)

• What it measures for GitLab CI: Cost per runner and cost per pipeline.
• Best-fit environment: Cloud-hosted runners or clusters.
• Setup outline:
• Tag runner instances and jobs with cost center metadata.
• Use provider billing export to attribute costs.
• Create cost dashboards and anomaly detection.
• Strengths:
• Direct cost visibility.
• Helps optimize autoscaling and job placement.
• Limitations:
• Attribution complexity for shared resources.

Tool — GitLab built-in metrics and pipelines UI

• What it measures for GitLab CI: Basic pipeline duration, job traces, coverage, and security scan summaries.
• Best-fit environment: Any GitLab-hosted or self-managed instance.
• Setup outline:
• Enable CI metrics in project and group settings.
• Use built-in dashboards for quick checks.
• Strengths:
• Easy to access and integrated with GitLab.
• No additional infrastructure.
• Limitations:
• Limited customization and long-term retention.

Recommended dashboards & alerts for GitLab CI

Executive dashboard

• Panels:
• Pipeline success rate for last 30/90 days — shows delivery health.
• Deployment frequency by service — indicates velocity.
• Mean time to merge and mean time to deploy — executive-level lead times.
• Runner cost trend — highlights cost impact.
• Why: Provide business stakeholders with a compact view of delivery reliability and cost.

On-call dashboard

• Panels:
• Active failing pipelines and failing jobs — quick triage list.
• Runner health and queue length — informs capacity issues.
• Recent deploys and rollback status — highlights recent risky changes.
• Critical alerts for secrets exposure and failed deployments — what on-call must act on.
• Why: Enable rapid detection and remediation during incidents.

Debug dashboard

• Panels:
• Job logs for failed jobs with links to artifacts.
• Per-test failure trend and flaky tests list.
• Artifact size and retrieval latency.
• Network and registry access errors.
• Why: Support deep investigation and root cause analysis.

Alerting guidance

• What should page vs ticket:
• Page (urgent): Production deployment failures causing user impact, secrets leaked in logs, broken rollback mechanisms, and runner critical outages.
• Ticket (non-urgent): Single test failure in non-blocking stage, scheduled pipeline failures, minor increase in job duration.
• Burn-rate guidance:
• Use deployment failure rate against an error budget. If burn rate crosses threshold (e.g., 2x expected), pause risky releases until healthy.
• Noise reduction tactics:
• Deduplicate by correlating alerts with pipeline and job IDs.
• Group alerts by project and environment.
• Suppress alerts during planned maintenance windows.

---

Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)

1) Prerequisites – GitLab account or self-managed instance with relevant permissions. – Runner infrastructure (shared runners or self-hosted). – Access to artifact and container registries. – Secrets management (GitLab variables or external vault). – Monitoring and logging stack (Prometheus/ELK/Grafana).

2) Instrumentation plan – Emit metrics: pipeline durations, job success/fail, runner health. – Export logs: job traces, runner logs, deployment outputs. – Tag resources: project, environment, team for attribution. – Define SLOs for pipeline success and deployment reliability.

3) Data collection – Configure GitLab Runner to expose Prometheus metrics. – Ship job logs to centralized logging using filebeat or runner logging. – Store artifacts in configured object storage with lifecycle rules.

4) SLO design – Identify critical paths: production deploys and release jobs. – Define SLIs: deployment success rate, time to rollback. – Set realistic SLOs based on historical data; start conservative and iterate.

5) Dashboards – Build executive, on-call, and debug dashboards described above. – Include drilldowns from high-level metrics to job traces.

6) Alerts & routing – Create alerts for critical failures and runner outages. – Route urgent alerts to on-call rotation with paging. – Create tickets for non-urgent anomalies assigned to service owner.

7) Runbooks & automation – Create runbooks for common failures: pending jobs, artifact errors, secret leaks. – Automate common fixes: scale runners, re-run failed jobs with cache refresh, auto-clean expired artifacts.

8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Load test runners and pipelines to validate autoscaling. – Run chaos experiments: simulate registry outage, simulate runner failure. – Conduct game days for on-call teams to practice pipeline incident response.

9) Continuous improvement – Weekly review flaky tests and failing pipelines. – Monthly cost and capacity review for runner autoscaling. – Quarterly policy updates for secrets and protected environments.

Pre-production checklist

• Validate .gitlab-ci.yml syntax with CI lint.
• Ensure runners available with required tags.
• Confirm secrets are in variables and masked.
• Create test environment or review app for deploy verification.
• Define artifact retention for test artifacts.

Production readiness checklist

• Protected branches and variables configured.
• Approval gates for production deploys and required reviewers set.
• Monitoring and alerts wired to on-call.
• Rollback procedure tested and documented.
• Cost and capacity thresholds set for runners.

Incident checklist specific to GitLab CI

• Verify pipeline failure details and job logs.
• Check runner pool health and queue length.
• Confirm artifact availability and registry access.
• Determine if rollback is required and initiate.
• Notify stakeholders and create postmortem ticket.

Kubernetes example (implementation snippet)

• Verify Kubernetes cluster access for runners.
• Register runners with Kubernetes executor.
• Set resource limits for job pods.
• Configure horizontal pod autoscaler for runners.
• Validate deploy jobs use kubeconfig stored as protected variable.

Managed cloud service example (implementation snippet)

• Use cloud-managed runners or runners in managed Kubernetes.
• Ensure runner service account has minimal required permissions.
• Store credentials in cloud KMS and use GitLab CI variables referencing them.
• Configure VPC connectivity for runners to access private registries.

---

Use Cases of GitLab CI

1. Microservice build and deploy – Context: Multi-repo microservices. – Problem: Manual builds and inconsistent deploys. – Why GitLab CI helps: Standardizes build, test, and deploy per service. – What to measure: Deployment frequency and failure rate. – Typical tools: Docker, Helm, Kubernetes.

2. Infrastructure as Code safety checks – Context: Terraform-managed infra changes. – Problem: Risky manual terraform applies causing outages. – Why GitLab CI helps: Run terraform plan and policy checks automatically. – What to measure: Plan approval time and apply failures. – Typical tools: Terraform, OPA, sentinel.

3. Release candidate review apps – Context: Feature previews for stakeholders. – Problem: Difficult to QA changes across environments. – Why GitLab CI helps: Create ephemeral review apps per MR. – What to measure: Review app creation time and resource cleanup rate. – Typical tools: Kubernetes, Helm.

4. Dependency and security scanning – Context: Third-party dependencies and supply chain risk. – Problem: Vulnerable libraries go unnoticed. – Why GitLab CI helps: Run dependency scans per merge request. – What to measure: Vulnerability detection rate and remediation time. – Typical tools: SAST tools, dependency scanners.

5. Data pipeline CI – Context: ETL and schema migrations. – Problem: Migrations cause production schema drift. – Why GitLab CI helps: Run migration tests and dry-run on staging. – What to measure: Migration failure rate and runtime. – Typical tools: Airflow, db migration tools.

6. Canary deployments for critical services – Context: High-risk releases affecting many users. – Problem: Large blast radius for standard deploys. – Why GitLab CI helps: Orchestrate canary releases with automated checks. – What to measure: Canary success rate and time to revert. – Typical tools: Service mesh, feature flags.

7. Batch job automation – Context: Nightly batch processes. – Problem: Manual kickoff and inconsistent environment. – Why GitLab CI helps: Schedule pipelines and enforce reproducible runs. – What to measure: Job completion rate and runtime variance. – Typical tools: Cron pipelines, Kubernetes cronjobs.

8. Compliance and audit pipelines – Context: Regulated deployments needing audit trails. – Problem: Lack of provable deploy steps and approvals. – Why GitLab CI helps: Enforce approvals, artifact versioning, and logs. – What to measure: Audit log completeness and approval latency. – Typical tools: GitLab approvals, audit logs.

9. Container image build and scanning – Context: Building images for distribution. – Problem: Image contents and vulnerabilities unmanaged. – Why GitLab CI helps: Automate build, sign, scan, and push to registry. – What to measure: Image scan pass rate and build time. – Typical tools: Docker, container scanners.

10. Serverless function deployment – Context: Short-lived functions on managed platforms. – Problem: Manual packaging and inconsistent deployments. – Why GitLab CI helps: Automate packaging and deployment to serverless platforms. – What to measure: Deployment success and cold-start metrics. – Typical tools: Serverless frameworks, managed function CLIs.

11. Multi-cloud deployment orchestration – Context: Deploying to several cloud providers. – Problem: Different CLIs and auth per provider. – Why GitLab CI helps: Central pipeline automates provider-specific steps. – What to measure: Multi-cloud deployment success and drift. – Typical tools: Cloud CLIs, IaC.

12. Post-incident remediation pipelines – Context: Quick fixes after incidents. – Problem: Emergency fixes lack audit and consistency. – Why GitLab CI helps: Enforce hotfix pipeline with approvals and rollbacks. – What to measure: Time to remediate and change success rate. – Typical tools: GitLab CI protected environments, runbooks.

---

Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)

Scenario #1 — Kubernetes canary deployment

Context: A high-traffic microservice runs on Kubernetes in production. Goal: Deploy new version with minimal user impact and automated rollback. Why GitLab CI matters here: Orchestrates build, image push, canary rollout, and automated checks. Architecture / workflow:

• Pipeline builds image, pushes to registry, triggers deployment job that applies Helm chart with canary weights.
• Monitoring evaluates canary health.
• Success promotes to full deployment; failure triggers rollback. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Build stage: docker build and push image tagged with commit SHA.
2. Deploy-canary stage: helm upgrade with replica subset and traffic split.
3. Smoke-test job: run synthetic tests against canary endpoints.
4. Monitor job: query metrics for errors and latency.
5. Promote job: if metrics good, update helm to full rollout.
6. Rollback job: on failed metrics, helm rollback to previous revision. What to measure:

• Canary health success rate, time to detect anomalies, rollback time. Tools to use and why:

• Helm for deploys, Prometheus for metrics, Grafana for dashboards, GitLab Runner Kubernetes executor. Common pitfalls:

• Insufficient isolation for canary leading to shared database side effects.

• Metrics lag causing false positives. Validation:

• Run canary in staging and simulate traffic. Outcome:

• Reduced blast radius and automated rollback on unhealthy canaries.

Scenario #2 — Serverless function CI/CD (managed PaaS)

Context: Functions deployed to managed serverless platform for event processing. Goal: Automate packaging, testing, and deploy to multiple environments. Why GitLab CI matters here: Provides consistent pipeline steps and environment promotion. Architecture / workflow:

• Pipeline builds function bundle, runs unit and integration tests, deploys to dev, then to staging and prod with approvals. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Build: package function and vendor dependencies.
2. Test: run unit tests and a lightweight integration test emulating events.
3. Deploy-dev: deploy via CLI to dev namespace.
4. Manual approval to staging.
5. Deploy-prod: deploy with protected environment and approval steps. What to measure:

• Deploy success rate, function invocation errors, cold starts. Tools to use and why:

• Serverless CLI, function platform monitoring, GitLab variables for credentials. Common pitfalls:

• Secrets embedded in pipeline; inconsistent runtimes across environments. Validation:

• End-to-end invocation tests and canary traffic for prod. Outcome:

• Reliable, auditable function deployments with approvals.

Scenario #3 — Incident response automation and postmortem

Context: Production incident caused by a faulty deployment. Goal: Automate rollback and collect forensic artifacts for postmortem. Why GitLab CI matters here: Automates rollback steps and captures job logs and artifacts for analysis. Architecture / workflow:

• Incident detection triggers a pipeline that reverts to previous tag and collects logs and metrics snapshots. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Alert triggers incident runbook pipeline with parameters (service, commit).
2. Pipeline runs rollback job to previous stable release.
3. Pipeline collects artifacts: logs, traces, snapshot of config and DB migration state.
4. Postmortem job opens issue template and attaches artifacts. What to measure:

• Time to rollback, completeness of collected artifacts, time to postmortem creation. Tools to use and why:

• GitLab CI for orchestration, logging and tracing backends for artifacts. Common pitfalls:

• Rollback fails because of incompatible database migration. Validation:

• Test rollback pipelines in staging. Outcome:

• Faster recovery and well-documented incidents for remediation.

Scenario #4 — Cost vs performance pipeline optimization

Context: CI costs are rising due to heavy parallel builds. Goal: Reduce pipeline cost while preserving acceptable developer feedback time. Why GitLab CI matters here: Allows experimentation with caching, job splitting, and runner placement. Architecture / workflow:

• Analyze cost per pipeline, identify heavy jobs, move heavy work to scheduled nightly jobs, and cache dependencies to speed repeated runs. Step-by-step implementation:

1. Measure cost and runtime per job.
2. Add caching for dependencies and artifact reuse.
3. Move large integration tests to nightly pipeline and create quick smoke tests for PRs.
4. Implement autoscaling runners with spot instances for non-critical builds.
5. Monitor cost and performance impact. What to measure:

• Cost per pipeline, mean feedback time for PRs, nightly job pass rate. Tools to use and why:

• Cost monitoring, Prometheus for job performance, GitLab schedules. Common pitfalls:

• Nightly backlog hides regressions until next day. Validation:

• Validate developer satisfaction and bug detection rate. Outcome:

• Lower CI cost while maintaining rapid developer feedback on critical changes.

---

Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting

List of common mistakes with Symptom -> Root cause -> Fix (15+ entries)

1. Symptom: Jobs stuck pending -> Root cause: No matching runners or offline runners -> Fix: Register runners with correct tags and ensure runner service is healthy.
2. Symptom: Tests pass locally but fail in CI -> Root cause: Environment mismatch (missing deps, different OS) -> Fix: Use containerized executor with same base image as dev environment.
3. Symptom: Secrets printed in logs -> Root cause: Echoing env vars or unmasked variables -> Fix: Use masked protected variables and avoid printing secrets.
4. Symptom: Artifact missing for downstream job -> Root cause: Artifact path mismatch or expired artifact -> Fix: Verify paths, ensure expire_in covers pipeline runtime.
5. Symptom: Flaky test causing pipeline instability -> Root cause: Non-deterministic tests or shared state -> Fix: Isolate test environment, add retries, and prioritize fixing flaky tests.
6. Symptom: Slow job startup -> Root cause: Cold runner or large container pull -> Fix: Use warm pools, smaller base images, and layer caching.
7. Symptom: High CI cost -> Root cause: Overparallelization or heavy jobs running in CI -> Fix: Move heavy tasks to scheduled jobs, optimize caching, use spot instances.
8. Symptom: Deployment succeeds but service unhealthy -> Root cause: Missing smoke tests or health checks -> Fix: Add pre/post deploy health checks and canary stage.
9. Symptom: Pipeline too long -> Root cause: Monolithic pipeline doing everything -> Fix: Break into child pipelines and parallelize independent tests.
10. Symptom: Secrets not available in pipeline -> Root cause: Variables not marked protected for protected branches -> Fix: Configure variable scope and branch protection correctly.
11. Symptom: Runner compromised -> Root cause: Public runner with shell executor or weak isolation -> Fix: Use Kubernetes or Docker executors with strict permissions.
12. Symptom: Registry access failures -> Root cause: Auth token expired or network block -> Fix: Rotate tokens and ensure runner network connectivity.
13. Symptom: Merge requests merged without pipeline -> Root cause: Merge checks not enforced -> Fix: Enable pipeline required merge checks and protected branches.
14. Symptom: Alerts noisy and ignored -> Root cause: Poor alert thresholds and lack of dedupe -> Fix: Refine thresholds, group alerts, and add suppression for maintenance.
15. Symptom: Unexpected rollback failure -> Root cause: Incompatible DB migrations between versions -> Fix: Design backward-compatible migrations and test rollback paths.
16. Symptom: Long artifact download times -> Root cause: Remote object storage misconfigured or network bottlenecks -> Fix: Use regional storage and proper presigned URLs.
17. Symptom: Missing audit trail for deployments -> Root cause: Manual deploys executed outside pipeline -> Fix: Enforce deployments via pipeline only and protect deploy jobs.
18. Symptom: CI minutes exceeded budget -> Root cause: Lack of quota management or rampant pipelines -> Fix: Enforce pipeline quotas and move low-value jobs to schedules.
19. Symptom: Inconsistent runner behavior -> Root cause: Mixed runner versions -> Fix: Standardize runner versions and apply rolling updates.
20. Symptom: Security scans ignored -> Root cause: Scans set allow_failure true -> Fix: Make critical scans blocking and track remediation tickets.
21. Symptom: Jobs fail intermittently with network errors -> Root cause: Transient network issues or DNS resolution -> Fix: Add retries and robust network configuration.
22. Symptom: Logs too verbose to debug -> Root cause: Unfiltered job logs and debug prints -> Fix: Adjust log levels and use structured logging for key events.
23. Symptom: Inefficient caching -> Root cause: Cache keys not granular or too broad -> Fix: Use sensible cache keys per dependency and job.
24. Symptom: Lack of visibility into pipeline health across teams -> Root cause: No centralized dashboards -> Fix: Build cross-team dashboards and standardized metrics.
25. Symptom: CI runs leaking resources -> Root cause: Jobs not cleaning up temporary resources -> Fix: Add cleanup steps and enforce lifecycle policies.

Observability pitfalls (at least 5 included above)

• Not collecting runner metrics leading to capacity blindspots.
• Not shipping job logs to a centralized location preventing correlation.
• Relying only on pipeline UI without time-series metrics for trends.
• Missing artifacts and reports due to improper retention.
• Alerts configured only on job failure counts without context of severity.

---

Best Practices & Operating Model

Ownership and on-call

• Assign CI platform team owning runners, shared templates, and cost controls.
• Service teams own pipeline definitions for their services and runbooks.
• On-call rotations include CI platform incidents and high-severity pipeline failures.

Runbooks vs playbooks

• Runbooks: Step-by-step operational tasks (restart runner, scaling).
• Playbooks: High-level decision and escalation flows for complex incidents.
• Keep runbooks versioned in repo and called from pipeline incident workflows.

Safe deployments

• Use canary, blue/green, or gradual rollouts with automated checks.
• Implement automatic rollback on failed health checks.
• Use feature flags to decouple deploy from release.

Toil reduction and automation

• Automate runner scaling, artifact cleanup, and dependency caching.
• Standardize templates and reusable CI configuration to reduce duplication.
• Automate security scans and remediation ticket creation.

Security basics

• Use protected variables and minimal runner permissions.
• Run untrusted builds on isolated runners (Kubernetes executor).
• Rotate runner tokens and audit runner registration events.

Weekly/monthly routines

• Weekly: Review failing pipelines and flaky tests; prune stale artifacts.
• Monthly: Cost and capacity review for runners; validate backups for object storage.
• Quarterly: Security audit for runners and pipeline roles; update CI templates.

What to review in postmortems related to GitLab CI

• Time-to-detect and time-to-recover for pipeline-related incidents.
• Root cause in CI config, runner infrastructure, or external dependencies.
• Whether runbooks were followed and sufficient.
• Improvements to SLOs and alerting.

What to automate first

• Runner autoscaling and health checks.
• Artifact retention cleanup.
• Security scan automation and blocking for critical vulnerabilities.
• Standard CI templates and macro jobs for common tasks.

---

Tooling & Integration Map for GitLab CI (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Category	What it does	Key integrations	Notes
I1	Runner	Executes jobs	Kubernetes, Docker, Shell	Use k8s for scale
I2	Container registry	Stores images	CI build/push	Configure cleanup
I3	Artifact storage	Stores artifacts	Object storage	Set expire_in
I4	Monitoring	Metrics and alerts	Prometheus, Grafana	Scrape runner metrics
I5	Logging	Central log storage	ELK, Loki	Ship job logs
I6	Secret manager	Stores secrets	Vault, cloud KMS	Use dynamic secrets
I7	IaC	Provision infra	Terraform, Cloud CLIs	Plan and apply in CI
I8	Security scanners	SAST/DAST	SAST tools, dependency scanners	Integrate reports
I9	GitOps	Reconcile cluster state	Flux, ArgoCD	Use CI to update repos
I10	Cost monitoring	Track CI cost	Cloud billing tools	Tag and allocate costs
I11	CDN / edge	Deploy edge configs	CDN CLI	Manage invalidation
I12	Test frameworks	Run tests	pytest, JUnit, Jest	Produce test reports
I13	Feature flags	Runtime feature toggles	FF services	Use with canary deploys
I14	Artifact signing	Image signing	Notary, sigstore	Enforce provenance
I15	Approvals	Manual gates	GitLab approvals	Protect production
I16	Scheduler	Scheduled pipelines	GitLab schedules	Nightly jobs
I17	Cache store	Shared cache backend	S3, GCS	Configure keys
I18	Audit & compliance	Track pipeline actions	Audit logs	Enable retention
I19	Backup	Backup artifacts and DB	Backup tools	Test restores
I20	Notifications	Alert channels	Pager, Slack	Connect alerts

Row Details (only if needed)

• I1: Kubernetes executor provides per-job pods and resource limits.
• I6: Vault integration reduces secret sprawl and supports dynamic creds.
• I9: Use CI to push changes to GitOps repo, controllers handle reconciliation.
• I14: Signing images prevents supply-chain tampering.
• I18: Ensure audit logs are retained per compliance requirements.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How do I start a pipeline for a merge request?

Create or update .gitlab-ci.yml in your branch; GitLab will automatically trigger a pipeline on the merge request event.

How do I run jobs only on protected branches?

Use only:variables or rules with protected: true and use protected variables accessible to protected branches.

How do I use GitLab CI with Kubernetes?

Register a runner with Kubernetes executor or use a Kubernetes-managed runner and configure kubeconfig as a protected variable.

How do I secure secrets in GitLab CI?

Store secrets as masked protected variables or integrate with an external secrets manager like Vault.

What’s the difference between GitLab Runner and GitLab CI?

GitLab CI is the pipeline orchestration inside GitLab; GitLab Runner is the agent that executes the jobs.

What’s the difference between shared and specific runners?

Shared runners are available to many projects; specific runners are registered for a project or group only.

What’s the difference between parent/child pipelines and multi-project pipelines?

Parent/child are dynamic pipeline relationships within a project; multi-project pipelines coordinate pipelines across projects.

How do I measure pipeline cost?

Tag runner resources, export billing, and attribute cost to pipeline runs; aggregate cost per pipeline from runner usage.

How do I reduce CI runtime?

Use caching, parallelize tests, avoid heavy integration tests on every push, and use efficient base images.

How do I handle flaky tests in CI?

Isolate and triage flaky tests, add retries temporarily, and prioritize stable test fixes with telemetry on flakiness.

How do I implement canary deploys with GitLab CI?

Create deploy jobs that shift traffic gradually, run health checks, and create promotion/rollback jobs based on metrics.

How do I manage runner autoscaling?

Use Kubernetes executor with Horizontal Pod Autoscaler or cloud autoscaling for self-hosted runner pools.

How do I debug failed jobs?

Inspect job logs, download artifacts, and reproduce the job locally with the same image or executor.

How do I enforce pipelines before merge?

Enable “pipelines must succeed” and protect branches requiring pipeline success before merging.

How do I integrate security scans into pipelines?

Add SAST/DAST and dependency scanning jobs in the pipeline and treat critical findings as blocking as needed.

How do I keep pipelines DRY across projects?

Use CI templates and includes to share common jobs and variables.

How do I handle large artifacts?

Use object storage with lifecycle policies and consider artifact granularity to reduce size.

---

Conclusion

GitLab CI provides an integrated, repository-driven platform for automating build, test, and deployment workflows with strong ties to GitLab’s SCM, permissions, and release features. For cloud-native and SRE-oriented organizations, GitLab CI is a practical tool to operationalize pipelines, implement safe deploy strategies, and integrate security and compliance checks. Success requires clear ownership, disciplined pipeline design, proper runner architecture, and observability.

Next 7 days plan (5 bullets)

• Day 1: Validate .gitlab-ci.yml with CI lint and ensure runners are registered and healthy.
• Day 2: Instrument basic metrics (pipeline success, job duration) into Prometheus.
• Day 3: Implement masked protected variables for secrets and rotate any exposed tokens.
• Day 4: Create on-call and debug dashboards and set critical alerts for deployment failures.
• Day 5: Run a game day simulating runner outage and test rollback procedures.

---

Appendix — GitLab CI Keyword Cluster (SEO)

• Primary keywords
• GitLab CI
• GitLab CI pipelines
• .gitlab-ci.yml
• GitLab Runner
• GitLab CI tutorial
• GitLab CI best practices
• GitLab CI pipelines examples
• GitLab CI Kubernetes
• GitLab CI caching

• GitLab CI artifacts

• Related terminology

• CI/CD
• pipeline orchestration
• runner autoscaling
• Kubernetes executor
• Docker executor
• shared runners
• specific runners
• pipeline success rate
• pipeline monitoring
• pipeline metrics
• job queue time
• job execution time
• artifact retention
• artifact storage
• container registry
• canary deployment
• blue green deployment
• feature flags
• masked variables
• protected variables
• protected branch
• merge request pipelines
• parent child pipelines
• DAG pipelines
• CI templates
• security scanning
• SAST
• DAST
• dependency scanning
• GitOps pipeline
• Helm deploy
• kubectl deploy
• terraform in CI
• secret management
• vault integration
• Prometheus metrics
• Grafana dashboards
• ELK job logs
• cost per pipeline
• flaky tests
• retry policy
• allow_failure
• pipeline triggers
• scheduled pipelines
• review apps
• CI minutes
• artifact reports
• image signing
• sigstore
• audit logs
• runner tags
• exit codes
• job logs
• CI lint
• runbooks
• game day
• autoscaling runners
• spot instance runners
• VPC runners
• private runners
• dynamic secrets
• pre deploy smoke test
• post deploy validation
• rollback automation
• release job
• release artifacts
• deployment frequency
• mean time to merge
• deployment lead time
• time to rollback
• error budget for deployments
• pipeline cost optimization
• caching strategies
• artifact expiration
• pipeline observability
• CI/CD security
• pipeline governance
• approvals in CI
• manual gates
• runner health
• job concurrency
• resource limits for jobs
• Kubernetes CI patterns
• serverless CI patterns
• managed CI runners
• self-hosted GitLab CI
• GitLab hosted CI
• merge request review apps
• per-branch pipelines
• multi-project pipelines
• child pipelines with includes
• dependency caching keys
• job artifacts download
• presigned URLs for artifacts
• testing in CI
• unit tests in pipeline
• integration tests in pipeline
• smoke tests in CI
• acceptance tests in pipeline
• pipeline debugging tips
• secrets in pipeline
• job isolation
• runner security
• CI/CD compliance
• pipeline audit trail
• CI/CD templates
• pipeline refactoring
• pipeline modularization
• CI/CD anti-patterns
• troubleshooting GitLab CI
• GitLab CI failure modes
• pipeline reliability
• GitLab CI SLOs
• pipeline SLIs
• CI dashboards for execs
• on-call dashboards for CI
• CI debug dashboards
• alert grouping for CI
• dedupe pipeline alerts
• suppression windows for CI
• CI incident response
• CI postmortem
• CI continuous improvement
• CI cost allocation
• CI billing export
• CI observability pitfalls
• CI artifact management
• CI cleanup jobs
• artifact lifecycle policies
• CI templates sharing
• group level CI templates
• CI lint validation
• pipeline policy as code
• GitLab CI automation
• GitLab CI migration strategies
• GitLab CI for enterprises
• GitLab CI for startups
• GitLab CI security best practices
• GitLab CI performance tuning
• GitLab CI reliability engineering
• GitLab CI DevOps workflows
• GitLab CI integration map
• GitLab CI glossary
• GitLab CI checklist