---

Quick Definition

Replatforming is the process of moving an application, service, or workload to a new runtime or infrastructure platform while making minimal changes to its core code and behavior, to gain operational, cost, or performance benefits.

Analogy: Replatforming is like moving a storefront from a strip mall into a modern shopping plaza—keeping the same merchandise and staff but changing the building, utilities, and foot-traffic management for better long-term operations.

Formal technical line: Replatforming replaces the underlying runtime, middleware, or infrastructure layer of a system with a different platform topology while preserving application-level interfaces and most functional code.

If Replatforming has multiple meanings, the most common meaning is moving an existing application to a different platform with minimal code changes. Other meanings include:

• Migrating middleware or runtimes (for example, switching Java app server or .NET runtime).
• Shifting build/runtime tooling (for example, swapping build pipelines to a cloud CI platform).
• Re-housing on managed platform services (for example, moving self-managed databases to managed DBaaS).

---

What is Replatforming?

What it is / what it is NOT

• What it is: A targeted migration strategy that changes platform layers (OS, container runtime, orchestration, PaaS) to improve operational metrics, cost, or developer velocity without a full rewrite.
• What it is NOT: A full refactor or redesign (that would be “refactoring” or “re-architecting”) and not a lift-and-shift rehost when no platform-specific optimizations or feature changes are made.

Key properties and constraints

• Minimal application code changes; primary changes occur in deployment, configuration, and runtime bindings.
• Focus on compatibility and preserving external interfaces (APIs, data contracts).
• Typically requires re-testing, CI/CD updates, and integration verification.
• May introduce transient risk due to environment-change regression, dependency mismatches, or different security boundaries.
• Cost and performance changes are likely but must be validated with metrics.

Where it fits in modern cloud/SRE workflows

• Sits between rehost (lift-and-shift) and refactor (re-architect) on the migration spectrum.
• Often part of cloud adoption lanes: move to managed services (PaaS), containerization, or serverless primitives.
• In SRE workflows, replatforming is a project driven by reliability, operability, and observability goals, with explicit SLIs/SLOs and change-controls.
• Commonly used to reduce toil, increase deployment velocity, or adopt platform-level security and compliance features.

Text-only “diagram description” readers can visualize

• Imagine three stacked layers:
• Top: Application code and APIs unchanged
• Middle: Platform layer replaced (e.g., VM to Kubernetes or container to serverless)
• Bottom: Infrastructure and managed cloud services replaced or reconfigured
• Arrows show CI/CD moving artifacts into the new platform and monitoring/observability tools attached to both environments during a cutover phase.

Replatforming in one sentence

Replatforming updates the runtime or hosting platform of an application to a newer or managed platform, preserving business logic while improving operations, cost, or developer experience.

Replatforming vs related terms (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Term	How it differs from Replatforming	Common confusion
T1	Rehost	Moves workload unchanged to new infra with no platform-specific changes	Confused because both move environments
T2	Refactor	Changes application code/architecture significantly	People mix up refactor and replatform by scope
T3	Rearchitect	Redesigns application components and interactions	Often thought to be same as optimization
T4	Replace	Swap application for new implementation	Confused when migrating to managed service
T5	Modernize	Umbrella term that may include replatforming	Vague and used as marketing term

Row Details (only if any cell says “See details below”)

Not needed.

---

Why does Replatforming matter?

Business impact (revenue, trust, risk)

• Revenue: Replatforming often enables faster feature delivery, reducing time-to-market for revenue-driving features; may lower hosting costs and increase margin.
• Trust: Improved reliability and predictable scaling improve customer trust; reduced incident frequency preserves brand reputation.
• Risk: Platform change introduces migration risk—data consistency, security boundary shifts, or compliance gaps—that must be managed.

Engineering impact (incident reduction, velocity)

• Incident reduction: Moving to managed runtimes can reduce operational incidents caused by infrastructure misconfiguration or patching lapses.
• Velocity: Developers may gain faster CI/CD pipelines, standardized deployments, and reusable platform primitives, increasing release cadence.
• Trade-offs: Velocity improvements are often contingent on good automation and training; without them, migration can slow teams.

SRE framing (SLIs/SLOs/error budgets/toil/on-call)

• SLIs: Platform-level availability, request latency, error rates, and deployment success rate can change after replatforming.
• SLOs: Replatforming should be driven by clearly defined SLO targets or the need to lower toil to preserve on-call capacity.
• Error budgets: Use error budgets to schedule replatforming windows and rollback conditions.
• Toil: One primary driver is reducing repetitive operational effort (toil) by adopting managed services or standardized platform operations.

3–5 realistic “what breaks in production” examples

• Failure to bind configuration: Legacy apps reading local config files fail because platform injects config via env vars.
• SSL/TLS termination mismatch: New platform terminates TLS at load balancer, but app expects in-host termination causing auth failures.
• File-system expectations: App writes to ephemeral container filesystem but expects persistence, causing data loss after redeploys.
• Dependency version drift: Platform uses different language runtime patch level causing subtle behavior changes or exceptions.
• Network policy differences: New platform blocks internal ports by default, disrupting inter-service RPC calls.

---

Where is Replatforming used? (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Layer/Area	How Replatforming appears	Typical telemetry	Common tools
L1	Edge and network	Move to cloud CDN or managed LB	Latency, edge error rate	CDN service, cloud LB
L2	Runtime / App	Replace VM with containers	Request latency, deploy time	Kubernetes, containers
L3	Platform / Orchestration	Move to managed K8s or PaaS	Pod restarts, schedule delays	Managed K8s, PaaS
L4	Data and storage	Migrate self-hosted DB to DBaaS	Ops latency, replication lag	Managed DB, backup tools
L5	CI/CD	Adopt cloud CI/CD	Build time, pipeline failures	Cloud CI, artifact registry
L6	Serverless	Move functions to FaaS	Cold start, execution errors	Cloud FaaS platforms
L7	Observability	Adopt hosted monitoring	Metric ingestion rate, alert latency	Observability SaaS
L8	Security	Use managed identity and secrets	Auth failures, secret rotation	IAM, secret managers

Row Details (only if needed)

Not needed.

---

When should you use Replatforming?

When it’s necessary

• When current platform prevents meeting SLOs or scale requirements.
• When security/compliance mandates managed controls not achievable on current stack.
• When infrastructure costs are unsustainable versus expected gains from managed services.

When it’s optional

• When the primary goal is developer convenience without reliability needs.
• When short-term performance is fine and budget is constrained.

When NOT to use / overuse it

• Avoid replatforming as a first-line solution for feature-level bugs or poor architecture.
• Don’t use it to delay necessary refactors where code-level changes are the root cause.
• Avoid frequent replatforming without stability goals; each move adds risk and cognitive load.

Decision checklist

• If SLO breaches and infra patching risk -> Replatform to managed service.
• If only code complexity is causing failures -> Refactor, not replatform.
• If costs high and ops overhead large -> Replatform for managed offerings.
• If migration risk > expected benefit and no automation -> Delay and automate more.

Maturity ladder: Beginner -> Intermediate -> Advanced

• Beginner: Containerize legacy app and run on managed container service with basic CI.
• Intermediate: Adopt orchestration, automated CI/CD pipelines, and managed DBs; add observability.
• Advanced: Platform engineering with self-service platform, GitOps, SLO-driven automation, automated canaries and progressive delivery.

Example decision for small teams

• Small team with single monolith and limited ops: Move to managed PaaS to reduce toil and free dev time.

Example decision for large enterprises

• Large enterprise with many microservices and strict compliance: Replatform shared infrastructure to managed Kubernetes with standardized operator workflows and centralized observability.

---

How does Replatforming work?

Step-by-step overview

1. Assessment and discovery: Inventory apps, dependencies, config, SLIs/SLOs, and data flows.
2. Target platform design: Choose managed service, container platform, or serverless target and define infra templates.
3. Proof of concept: Migrate a low-risk service end-to-end and validate telemetry.
4. CI/CD and automation changes: Update build, test, and deployment pipelines for the new platform.
5. Observability and security integration: Ensure metrics, logs, traces, policy, and secrets are wired.
6. Staged migration: Canary or blue-green deploy per service with rollback plans.
7. Cutover and decommission: Move traffic, monitor error budgets, and decommission old platform.
8. Post-migration tuning and runbook updates: Update docs, on-call runbooks, and automation.

Components and workflow

• Components: Source repo, artifact registry, pipeline, target runtime, managed services, secrets manager, observability stack, and deployment controller.
• Workflow: Developer pushes commit -> CI builds artifacts -> CD deploys to target platform -> Observability and synthetic tests validate -> Gradual traffic shift -> Monitoring and rollback if SLOs degrade.

Data flow and lifecycle

• Build artifact lifecycle: Code -> Build -> Artifact -> Container image or bundle -> Deployed to platform -> Observed by telemetry -> Retired.
• Data lifecycle: Migrate data snapshots or use replication streams to sync between old and new data stores; ensure dual-write or read-routing strategies during cutover.

Edge cases and failure modes

• Data affinity and latency: Stateful services dependent on locality may see latency differences.
• Dependency incompatibility: Native libraries, OS-level expectations, or kernel features may not exist on new platform.
• Secrets and identity: Different secrets models require mapping old secrets to new identity frameworks.
• Regulatory constraints: Data residency and audit trails may not be supported identically.

Short practical examples (pseudocode)

• Example: CI pipeline change pseudocode
• Build image
• Push to artifact registry
• Update deployment manifest
• Trigger k8s rollout
• Example: Data cutover flow pseudocode
• Snapshot DB
• Create replica in target
• Dual-write for a period
• Validate consistency
• Switch reads to new DB
• Decommission old DB

Typical architecture patterns for Replatforming

• Lift and Improve: Move to similar infra (VM to VM) but add managed services or autoscaling. Use when quick wins needed.
• Containerization with Orchestration: Package apps in containers and deploy to Kubernetes or managed container platform. Use when you need portability and scaling.
• PaaS Adoption: Move apps to a platform-as-a-service with minimal operational overhead. Use when developer velocity is priority.
• Serverless / FaaS: Repackage stateless functions to run on serverless platforms. Use when event-driven and unpredictable load patterns exist.
• Hybrid Data Migration: Keep compute on one platform but migrate storage to managed DBs with replication. Use when storage ops are bottleneck.
• Strangler Pattern: Incrementally replace parts of a monolith by routing certain features to new platform endpoints. Use when phased migration is needed.

Failure modes & mitigation (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Failure mode	Symptom	Likely cause	Mitigation	Observability signal
F1	Config mismatch	App crashes on startup	Env vars or config schema changed	Validate configs in CI and fail fast	Crash counts during deploy
F2	Dependency break	Runtime exceptions	Library or runtime version mismatch	Pin runtime and test matrix	Error rate spike after deploy
F3	Data inconsistency	Missing or stale data	Replication lag or dual-write conflicts	Verify checksums and use transactional replication	Replication lag metric
F4	Network policy block	RPC timeouts	New platform network defaults block ports	Adjust network policy and test connectivity	Increased request latency/timeouts
F5	Resource exhaustion	OOM or CPU thrashing	Wrong resource requests/limits	Set resource limits and autoscaling	Container restarts and OOM kills
F6	Security misconfig	Auth failures	Different IAM mapping or secrets path	Map identities and rotate secrets safely	Auth failure metrics
F7	Observability gap	Lack of metrics/traces	Monitoring agents absent or misconfigured	Deploy sidecars or agent configs via automation	Missing metric series
F8	Rollout regression	High user errors	Canary rules too broad or missing rollback	Implement automated rollback and canaries	Canary error budget burn

Row Details (only if needed)

Not needed.

---

Key Concepts, Keywords & Terminology for Replatforming

• Application Binary Interface (ABI) — Compatibility layer between compiled code and runtime — Matters for native libs — Pitfall: assuming identical ABI across platforms.
• Artifact Registry — Central store for build artifacts — Ensures reproducible deployments — Pitfall: not pruning old artifacts.
• Autoscaling — Automatic scaling of instances/pods — Improves resilience and cost — Pitfall: misconfigured thresholds causing thrash.
• Blue-Green Deployment — Two identical environments for safe cutover — Reduces downtime — Pitfall: database migrations not backward compatible.
• Canary Release — Gradual traffic shift to new version — Limits blast radius — Pitfall: insufficient canary sample size.
• Configuration Management — Declarative config for deployments — Ensures consistency — Pitfall: secrets committed to repo.
• Container Image — Packaged app + runtime — Portable runtime unit — Pitfall: large images slow deploys.
• Continuous Delivery (CD) — Automated deployment pipeline — Speeds releases — Pitfall: missing automated tests in CD.
• Continuous Integration (CI) — Automated build and test process — Ensures quality — Pitfall: flaky tests blocking pipeline.
• Data Migration Window — Planned timeframe for moving data — Minimizes inconsistency — Pitfall: underestimated duration causing dual systems drift.
• Database Replica — Copy of DB for migration — Helps zero-downtime migrations — Pitfall: lag causing data loss on cutover.
• Dead-letter Queue — Storage for failed messages — Prevents data loss — Pitfall: not monitoring DLQ growth.
• Dependency Graph — Map of service and library dependencies — Essential for impact analysis — Pitfall: undocumented transitive deps.
• Deployment Manifest — Declarative deployment spec (k8s, PaaS) — Defines runtime behavior — Pitfall: environment-specific overrides not versioned.
• Drift Detection — Detects config differences across environments — Prevents divergence — Pitfall: alerts flood without context.
• Dual-write — Writing to old and new systems during migration — Enables validation — Pitfall: eventual consistency issues.
• Endpoint Contract — API or interface definition — Must be preserved for clients — Pitfall: subtle semantic changes.
• Feature Flag — Toggle feature routing to new platform — Enables safe testing — Pitfall: flag entanglement.
• Immutable Infrastructure — Replace rather than mutate instances — Simplifies rollback — Pitfall: stateful services need special handling.
• Infrastructure as Code (IaC) — Declarative infra definitions — Improves reproducibility — Pitfall: unmanaged manual changes.
• Integration Test — Tests cross-service behavior — Validates platform compatibility — Pitfall: integration test flakiness.
• Load Balancer — Distributes traffic to instances — Key to traffic cutover — Pitfall: session affinity changes causing errors.
• Managed Service — Cloud-provided service with ops included — Reduces operator burden — Pitfall: vendor-specific constraints.
• Microservice — Small, single-responsibility service — Easier to migrate individually — Pitfall: distributed complexity.
• Observability — Metrics, logs, traces for system health — Critical for rollback decisions — Pitfall: insufficient retention for debugging.
• Operator Pattern — Kubernetes operator for app automation — Provides lifecycle automation — Pitfall: operator complexity.
• Orchestration — Controller for container lifecycle — Central to containerized replatforming — Pitfall: insufficient resource quotas.
• Polyglot Runtime — Multiple runtime languages/coexistence — Affects platform choice — Pitfall: runtime different behavior under new platform.
• Progressive Delivery — Gradual deploys with safeguards — Reduces risk — Pitfall: complexity in pipelines.
• Refactor — Change application internals without changing functionality — Different from replatforming — Pitfall: underestimating scope.
• Rehost — Move to new infra unchanged — Simpler but fewer benefits — Pitfall: misses opportunity for operational improvement.
• Rearchitect — Major change to app design — Most effort-intensive — Pitfall: long timelines.
• Rollback — Reverting to previous deployment — Safety net — Pitfall: data migrations may make rollback partial.
• Sandboxing — Isolated testing environment — Tests new platform impact — Pitfall: non-representative sandbox configuration.
• Secrets Management — Secure storage and rotation of keys — Essential for security — Pitfall: hard-coded secrets in images.
• Service Mesh — Adds routing, security, observability at network layer — Useful in complex microservices — Pitfall: adds latency and complexity.
• Sidecar — Helper container deployed alongside app — Provides cross-cutting features — Pitfall: resource contention if misconfigured.
• Synthetic Test — Automated end-to-end test against runtime — Validates user journeys — Pitfall: brittle tests if UI changes often.
• Strangler Pattern — Incremental replacement of monolith components — Enables gradual migration — Pitfall: complexity of mixed stacks.
• Telemetry Pipeline — Collects and processes metrics/logs/traces — Vital for SRE decisions — Pitfall: backpressure during migration causing data loss.
• Throttling — Rate limiting at app or platform level — Protects downstream systems — Pitfall: overly aggressive throttles impact UX.
• Transition Plan — Detailed migration schedule and rollback plan — Reduces surprises — Pitfall: lack of stakeholder communication.

---

How to Measure Replatforming (Metrics, SLIs, SLOs) (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Metric/SLI	What it tells you	How to measure	Starting target	Gotchas
M1	Platform availability	Platform-level uptime	Synthetic pings to endpoints	99.9% for non-critical	Synthetic not equal to real-user
M2	Request success rate	User-facing error rate	Successful responses / total	99.5% initial	Partial failures may hide issues
M3	Median latency	Typical request latency	50th percentile latency	Baseline +/- 20%	Tail latency matters more
M4	P95 latency	Tail latency behavior	95th percentile latency	Baseline + acceptable delta	Noise from burst traffic
M5	Deployment success rate	Frequency of failed deploys	Successful deployments/total	>95%	Flaky test failures inflate errors
M6	Time to rollback	Time to revert faulty deploy	Time from detect to rollback	<15 minutes for critical	DB migrations complicate rollback
M7	Error budget burn rate	Speed error budget consumed	Error budget used per hour	Keep burn < threshold	Needs correct budget sizing
M8	Observability coverage	Fraction of services instrumented	Instrumented endpoints/total	>90%	Instrumentation gaps hide regressions
M9	Mean time to detect (MTTD)	How quickly issues are found	Time from fault to alert	Minutes for critical	Alert tuning required
M10	Mean time to mitigate (MTTM)	Time to reduce impact	Time from alert to mitigation	Depends on SLO severity	Runbooks speed mitigation
M11	Cost per request	Economic efficiency	Cloud cost / requests	Varies by app	Hidden platform fees possible
M12	Resource efficiency	Utilization vs requested	CPU/memory used / requested	Target 60–80%	Under-requesting can cause OOM

Row Details (only if needed)

Not needed.

Best tools to measure Replatforming

Tool — Prometheus

• What it measures for Replatforming: Metrics ingestion for infrastructure and app metrics.
• Best-fit environment: Kubernetes and containerized workloads.
• Setup outline:
• Deploy Prometheus operator or server
• Configure scrape targets and service discovery
• Define alerting rules and record rules
• Strengths:
• High flexibility in query language
• Wide ecosystem of exporters
• Limitations:
• Long-term storage needs extra components
• Scalability requires federation or remote write

Tool — OpenTelemetry

• What it measures for Replatforming: Tracing and telemetry standardization.
• Best-fit environment: Polyglot microservices and hybrid platforms.
• Setup outline:
• Instrument libraries or auto-instrumentation
• Configure collector pipelines
• Export to backend
• Strengths:
• Vendor-agnostic telemetry
• Unified traces/metrics/logs approach
• Limitations:
• Instrumentation effort for legacy apps
• Sampling configuration complexity

Tool — Grafana

• What it measures for Replatforming: Dashboards and visualization for metrics/traces.
• Best-fit environment: Multi-cloud and on-prem monitoring.
• Setup outline:
• Connect data sources (Prometheus, Loki)
• Create dashboards for SLOs and health
• Configure alerting channels
• Strengths:
• Flexible dashboards and panels
• Rich plugin ecosystem
• Limitations:
• Requires data sources; not a collector
• Role-based UI controls vary by edition

Tool — Fluentd / Fluent Bit

• What it measures for Replatforming: Log collection and forwarding.
• Best-fit environment: Container platforms and servers.
• Setup outline:
• Deploy agents on nodes or as sidecars
• Configure output to log backend
• Add parsing and filtering rules
• Strengths:
• High throughput and plugin support
• Lightweight agent available
• Limitations:
• Parsing complex logs can be fragile
• Backpressure handling varies

Tool — Cloud Provider Monitoring (managed)

• What it measures for Replatforming: Platform-level metrics and integration with cloud services.
• Best-fit environment: Native managed cloud services.
• Setup outline:
• Enable provider monitoring APIs
• Configure dashboards and alerts
• Integrate with IAM and logs
• Strengths:
• Deep cloud service insights
• Often zero-config for providers
• Limitations:
• Vendor lock-in and limited customization
• Cost and retention policies vary

Recommended dashboards & alerts for Replatforming

Executive dashboard

• Panels:
• Overall platform availability: why — high-level health.
• Error budget utilization across services: why — business risk view.
• Cost trend and cost per request: why — financial impact.
• Migration progress: percentage of services migrated: why — program status.

On-call dashboard

• Panels:
• Current incident list and severity: why — action priority.
• Service SLOs and current burn rate: why — decide escalation.
• Recent deploys and related changes: why — quick triage.
• Top error traces and logs for affected service: why — debugging.

Debug dashboard

• Panels:
• Per-service request rate and error breakdown: why — root cause.
• Traces sampled for recent errors: why — flow analysis.
• Pod/container resource usage and restarts: why — resource issues.
• DB replication lag and storage I/O: why — data issues.

Alerting guidance

• What should page vs ticket:
• Page: SLO breach risk, production P1/P0 outages, data corruption events.
• Ticket: Replatforming progress blockers, non-urgent deploy failures, post-mortem tasks.
• Burn-rate guidance:
• If burn-rate exceeds 3x baseline for critical SLO, escalate to page.
• Use error budget windows to throttle migrations if burn accelerates.
• Noise reduction tactics:
• Deduplicate alerts by aggregated alerting rules.
• Group alerts by service and root cause tags.
• Suppress alerts during planned migration windows with clear auto-reenable.

---

Implementation Guide (Step-by-step)

1) Prerequisites – Inventory services, dependencies, data stores, and SLIs. – Baseline metrics for latency, errors, and throughput. – Access and IAM mapping for target platform. – Automated CI and test suites.

2) Instrumentation plan – Ensure metrics, traces, and logs are present for each service. – Add health checks and readiness probes. – Define synthetic tests for critical user journeys.

3) Data collection – Establish log collection and retention policy. – Start dual telemetry collection to compare old vs new platform. – Capture deployment metadata for correlation.

4) SLO design – Define SLIs for availability, latency, and error rate per service. – Set realistic SLOs based on baseline and business needs. – Define error budget policies for migration windows.

5) Dashboards – Create executive, on-call, and debug dashboards. – Add migration progress panels and golden signals. – Include deploy and traffic-shift panels.

6) Alerts & routing – Create alerts for SLO burn, deployment failure, and data drift. – Map alerts to on-call rotations and runbooks. – Use escalation policies for high-severity failures.

7) Runbooks & automation – Author runbooks for common failures and rollback steps. – Automate routine steps: database snapshot, DNS update, deploy rollback. – Add automated canaries and health gates in CD pipelines.

8) Validation (load/chaos/game days) – Perform load tests simulating production traffic before cutover. – Run chaos experiments to validate resilience assumptions. – Schedule game days to exercise runbooks and escalation.

9) Continuous improvement – Capture post-mortems and update runbooks. – Iterate on SLOs and observability gaps. – Reuse migration templates for future services.

Checklists

Pre-production checklist

• Inventory complete and owners assigned.
• CI/CD pipeline updated for target platform.
• Instrumentation present for metrics, logs, traces.
• Backup and rollback plans validated.
• Security policies and secrets mapped.

Production readiness checklist

• Canary deployment passed with target load.
• Error budget under threshold for relevant SLOs.
• DB replication/consistency verified.
• Observability and alerting active.
• On-call aware of migration window and contacts.

Incident checklist specific to Replatforming

• Triage: Identify whether failure is platform or app level.
• Mitigation: Scale back canary or route traffic away.
• Rollback: Trigger automated rollback if health gates fail.
• Communication: Notify stakeholders and open incident channel.
• Postmortem: Record root cause and update playbooks.

Examples

• Kubernetes example: Ensure readiness/liveness probes, define resource requests/limits, deploy Prometheus scraping, configure PodDisruptionBudgets, test rolling update and rollback via kubectl rollout.
• Managed cloud service example: Create managed DB instance, set IAM roles, migrate via logical replication, update application connection strings via secrets manager, and validate latency and throughput.

What to verify and what “good” looks like

• Good: Canary serves sample traffic with equal or better errors and latency and no data drift.
• Good: Alerts stable, no surge in retries, error budget consumption within planned window.
• Good: Deployment automation completes in target time and rollbacks succeed under simulated failure.

---

Use Cases of Replatforming

1) Legacy monolith to PaaS – Context: Small team running a monolith on VMs with manual deployments. – Problem: High ops toil and slow releases. – Why Replatforming helps: PaaS removes infrastructure maintenance and simplifies deploys. – What to measure: Deployment frequency, lead time, error budget. – Typical tools: PaaS provider, CI, secret manager.

2) Self-managed DB to DBaaS – Context: Team running PostgreSQL on VMs with backup pains. – Problem: High maintenance and inconsistent backups. – Why Replatforming helps: Managed DB automates backups and scaling. – What to measure: Replication lag, failover time, cost per GB. – Typical tools: Managed DB offerings, replication tools.

3) VM-hosted services to Kubernetes – Context: Multiple microservices on VMs with bespoke deploy scripts. – Problem: Inconsistent deployments and scaling issues. – Why Replatforming helps: Standardized orchestration, autoscaling, and resource isolation. – What to measure: Pod restarts, deployment success rate, latency. – Typical tools: Kubernetes, Helm, Prometheus.

4) On-prem message broker to managed messaging – Context: In-house Kafka clusters causing operational burden. – Problem: Upgrades and partition rebalancing causing outages. – Why Replatforming helps: Managed messaging reduces ops and offers SLA. – What to measure: Throughput, consumer lag, message retention. – Typical tools: Managed pub/sub, consumer monitoring.

5) Function migration to serverless – Context: Event processors with spiky load patterns. – Problem: Underutilized VMs and difficulty scaling on spikes. – Why Replatforming helps: Serverless scales automatically and reduces cost. – What to measure: Cold starts, execution duration, cost per invocation. – Typical tools: Cloud FaaS, event triggers.

6) CI migration to cloud CI – Context: Local build servers limit concurrent builds. – Problem: Long queue times and slow feedback. – Why Replatforming helps: Cloud CI provides parallelism and scaling. – What to measure: Queue time, build success rate, build duration. – Typical tools: Cloud CI, artifact registry.

7) Observability consolidation – Context: Multiple monitoring tools causing fragmentation. – Problem: Difficult cross-service correlation. – Why Replatforming helps: Unified observability reduces time to detect and mitigate. – What to measure: MTTD, telemetry coverage, alert accuracy. – Typical tools: Observability platform, OpenTelemetry.

8) API gateway replatform to managed gateway – Context: Self-hosted routing and auth. – Problem: Scaling and TLS certificate management. – Why Replatforming helps: Managed gateway simplifies routing and TLS. – What to measure: Request latency, auth failures, certificate expiry events. – Typical tools: Managed API gateway service.

9) Edge caching adoption – Context: Global user base with high latency. – Problem: Slow page loads and regional latency spikes. – Why Replatforming helps: CDN reduces latency and load on origin. – What to measure: Edge hit ratio, origin requests, page load times. – Typical tools: CDN, cache invalidation automation.

10) Operator adoption for platform tasks – Context: Complex app lifecycle scripts leading to drift. – Problem: Manual operations and inconsistencies. – Why Replatforming helps: Kubernetes operators automate lifecycle. – What to measure: Manual intervention count, operator error rate. – Typical tools: K8s operator SDKs and controllers.

11) Logging pipeline to managed log analytics – Context: Ingest pipeline fails under load. – Problem: Missing logs during incidents. – Why Replatforming helps: Managed pipelines handle retention and backpressure. – What to measure: Log ingestion rate, latency, lost log count. – Typical tools: Log backend as a service.

12) Secret management centralization – Context: Secrets scattered across repos and VMs. – Problem: Security incidents and credential leakage. – Why Replatforming helps: Central secrets manager with rotation reduces risk. – What to measure: Secret rotations, access logs, secret exposure incidents. – Typical tools: Secret management service.

---

Scenario Examples (Realistic, End-to-End)

Scenario #1 — Kubernetes migration for microservices

Context: A company runs dozens of microservices on VMs with ad-hoc deploy scripts.
Goal: Standardize runtime, reduce manual ops, improve autoscaling.
Why Replatforming matters here: Centralized orchestration reduces inconsistency and improves resource utilization.
Architecture / workflow: Source repos -> CI builds images -> Image registry -> Kubernetes cluster -> Service mesh and observability.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Inventory services and dependencies.
• Containerize each service with minimal code changes.
• Create Helm charts and namespaces.
• Deploy Prometheus, Grafana, and OpenTelemetry.
• Run canary for one service and validate SLOs.
• Gradually migrate traffic and decommission VMs. What to measure: Pod restart rate, deployment success, P95 latency.
  Tools to use and why: Kubernetes (orchestration), Helm (packaging), Prometheus (metrics), OpenTelemetry (traces).
  Common pitfalls: Missing readiness probes causing traffic to hit incomplete pods.
  Validation: Canary stable for 24–72 hours under load tests.
  Outcome: Reduced deploy variance, improved scaling, and lower ops toil.

Scenario #2 — Serverless event processing for bursty workloads

Context: An e-commerce site processes order events with unpredictable bursts.
Goal: Reduce cost and auto-scale event processors.
Why Replatforming matters here: Serverless handles spikes without pre-provisioned capacity.
Architecture / workflow: Event source -> FaaS (functions) -> Managed DB -> Observability and DLQ.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Refactor event handler into stateless function.
• Configure event triggers and idempotency.
• Add DLQ and retries policy.
• Monitor cold starts and tune memory allocations.
• Shift traffic and observe cost per invocation. What to measure: Invocation latency, cold start rate, DLQ growth.
  Tools to use and why: Cloud FaaS, managed queue, monitoring for traces.
  Common pitfalls: Stateful assumptions in function code leading to failures.
  Validation: Spike tests that simulate real traffic bursts.
  Outcome: Lower cost for idle periods and automatic handling of bursts.

Scenario #3 — Postmortem-driven replatform after incident

Context: Critical outage caused by self-managed message broker flood.
Goal: Prevent recurrence and reduce operational burden.
Why Replatforming matters here: Managed messaging eliminates upgrade drift and offers guaranteed scaling.
Architecture / workflow: Producers -> Managed messaging -> Consumers -> Monitoring.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Postmortem identifies root cause and required SLAs.
• Select managed messaging offering with required features.
• Migrate producers and consumers with dual-write for validation.
• Implement throttling and observability on intake.
• Decommission old cluster after validation. What to measure: Consumer lag, throughput, incidents per month.
  Tools to use and why: Managed messaging, consumer clients with metrics.
  Common pitfalls: Underestimating migration throughput causing queue buildup.
  Validation: Run soak test at 2x normal load.
  Outcome: Fewer broker-related incidents and faster recovery.

Scenario #4 — Cost vs performance trade-off migration

Context: Image processing pipeline has high infrastructure cost on fixed VMs.
Goal: Reduce costs while preserving throughput and latency.
Why Replatforming matters here: Replatform to spot-backed autoscaling containers to reduce cost.
Architecture / workflow: Upload -> Queue -> Worker containers -> Storage -> CDN.
Step-by-step implementation:

• Profile workload and CPU/memory usage.
• Containerize workers and enable autoscaling with spot instances.
• Implement checkpointing for interrupted work.
• Monitor job completion time and retry behavior. What to measure: Cost per processed image, job latency, failed tasks.
  Tools to use and why: Kubernetes with cluster autoscaler, queue service, monitoring.
  Common pitfalls: Spot instance preemption causing incomplete jobs without checkpointing.
  Validation: 7-day cost and throughput comparison.
  Outcome: Significant cost savings with slight increase in average job latency managed by retries.

---

Common Mistakes, Anti-patterns, and Troubleshooting

1) Mistake: No inventory before migration
– Symptom: Unexpected failures after cutover
– Root cause: Missing dependency mapping
– Fix: Run automated discovery and dependency mapping tools

2) Mistake: Inadequate observability on new platform
– Symptom: Hard to diagnose post-migration incidents
– Root cause: Missing metrics/traces/logs instrumentation
– Fix: Deploy agents/collectors and add health checks before traffic shift

3) Mistake: Single-step mass cutover
– Symptom: Widespread outages
– Root cause: Large blast radius with no canary
– Fix: Use canaries, feature flags, and staged rollouts

4) Mistake: Ignoring data replication lag
– Symptom: Stale reads or lost writes after cutover
– Root cause: Insufficient replication monitoring
– Fix: Implement replication lag metrics and stop-the-world migration windows

5) Mistake: Secrets not migrated securely
– Symptom: Auth failures or leaked credentials
– Root cause: Hard-coded or improperly rotated secrets
– Fix: Use secrets manager and map old secrets to new identities

6) Mistake: Resource requests/limits misconfigured
– Symptom: OOM kills and restarts in production
– Root cause: No profiling or conservative defaults
– Fix: Profile workloads and set requests/limits; enable autoscaler

7) Mistake: Overlooking platform-specific networking defaults
– Symptom: RPC failures and timeouts
– Root cause: New network policies block traffic
– Fix: Predefine network policies and test connectivity per namespace

8) Mistake: Not automating rollbacks
– Symptom: Long manual rollback times during incidents
– Root cause: Manual rollback process or missing automation
– Fix: Add rollback automation in CD pipelines with health gates

9) Mistake: Poor canary sampling
– Symptom: Canary passes but production fails
– Root cause: Canary traffic not representative
– Fix: Use representative traffic, synthetic tests, and staged ramp-up

10) Mistake: Missing database migration plan
– Symptom: Incompatible schema changes break clients
– Root cause: No backward-compatible migrations strategy
– Fix: Use expand-contract migration pattern and dual-read/write if needed

11) Mistake: Over-reliance on vendor-specific features
– Symptom: Lock-in and future migration complexity
– Root cause: Heavy use of proprietary APIs without abstraction
– Fix: Isolate vendor calls with adapter layer or evaluate lock-in risks

12) Mistake: No cost monitoring during migration
– Symptom: Unexpected cloud bill spike
– Root cause: Parallel duplication of resources and test workloads
– Fix: Track cost per resource and set budgets/alerts

13) Observability pitfall: Low retention of traces
– Symptom: Incomplete root cause after incidents
– Root cause: Short retention or sampling too aggressive
– Fix: Increase retention for critical windows and adjust sampling

14) Observability pitfall: Missing deployment metadata in traces
– Symptom: Hard to correlate traces with deployments
– Root cause: Not attaching commit or deploy IDs
– Fix: Embed deployment metadata in traces and logs

15) Observability pitfall: Alert fatigue during migration
– Symptom: Alerts ignored and true incidents missed
– Root cause: Poorly tuned thresholds and duplicate alerts
– Fix: Silence migration-related expected alerts and tune rules

16) Observability pitfall: Fragmented telemetry across tools
– Symptom: Long mean time to detect root cause
– Root cause: Multiple uncorrelated systems
– Fix: Standardize on telemetry format and central correlation keys

17) Mistake: Not updating runbooks after migration
– Symptom: Slower incident resolution and confusion
– Root cause: Old runbooks reference legacy infra
– Fix: Update runbooks and run playbook drills

18) Mistake: Ignoring compliance requirements during migration
– Symptom: Audit failures or regulatory exposure
– Root cause: Unmapped data residency or logging policies
– Fix: Validate compliance requirements in the design phase

19) Mistake: Not testing failover scenarios
– Symptom: Unverified resilience during incidents
– Root cause: No chaos or failover tests
– Fix: Run chaos experiments and simulated failovers

20) Mistake: Underestimating training needs for platform changes
– Symptom: Slow developer productivity post-migration
– Root cause: No training or docs for new platform features
– Fix: Provide hands-on sessions and updated docs

21) Mistake: Not validating client-side compatibility
– Symptom: Client apps break with new endpoint behavior
– Root cause: Unchanged client assumptions about semantics
– Fix: Test client flows and preserve API contracts

22) Mistake: Not pruning old artifacts and infra
– Symptom: Excess cost and unclear ownership
– Root cause: Incomplete decommission process
– Fix: Automate teardown and maintain decommission checklist

23) Mistake: Overcomplicated operator implementations
– Symptom: Operator bugs cause outages
– Root cause: Large operator logic handling many edge cases
– Fix: Simplify operator, keep idempotent operations, and add tests

24) Mistake: Missing SLO alignment with migration goals
– Symptom: Migration proceeds without reliability guardrails
– Root cause: No SLO-driven decision making
– Fix: Define SLOs and tie migration rollback to error budget state

---

Best Practices & Operating Model

Ownership and on-call

• Platform team owns migration templates, CI/CD primitives, and shared observability.
• Service teams own their service-level SLOs, instrumentation, and runbooks.
• On-call rotations must include platform knowledge for migration windows.

Runbooks vs playbooks

• Runbooks: Step-by-step instructions for known failure modes (used during incidents).
• Playbooks: Higher-level decision trees for humans to decide next steps during novel incidents.
• Keep both version-controlled and regularly exercised.

Safe deployments (canary/rollback)

• Automate canaries with health gates and SLO checks.
• Keep short rollback paths that do not depend on irreversible data migrations.
• Implement progressive delivery tools and automated rollback triggers.

Toil reduction and automation

• Automate repetitive tasks: build, deploy, rollbacks, snapshotting, and verification.
• Automate typical incident diagnosis steps: collect logs, tail key metrics, fetch traces.
• First automation priority: deploy and rollback path; second: test and verification automation.

Security basics

• Use least-privilege IAM roles and map old permissions to new ones.
• Centralize secrets with rotation and access logging.
• Validate network policies and TLS termination points.

Weekly/monthly routines

• Weekly: Review recent deploy failures, SLO burn, and open migration blockers.
• Monthly: Cost review, retention and telemetry checks, and tech debt backlog grooming.

What to review in postmortems related to Replatforming

• Root cause with evidence stream (metrics/traces/logs).
• Migration steps that succeeded or failed.
• Time-to-detect and time-to-mitigate during migration incidents.
• Action items for automation and runbook updates.

What to automate first

• CI/CD pipeline for building and deploying to target platform.
• Health gates and canary automation with rollback.
• Automated backups/snapshots and validation steps.
• Deployment metadata capture in telemetry.

---

Tooling & Integration Map for Replatforming (TABLE REQUIRED)

ID	Category	What it does	Key integrations	Notes
I1	CI/CD	Build and deploy artifacts	Artifact registry, k8s, PaaS	Central to migration pipelines
I2	Container Registry	Stores images	CI, CD, k8s	Prune unused images regularly
I3	Orchestration	Run containers or workloads	Registry, monitoring	K8s or managed alternatives
I4	Observability	Collects metrics/logs/traces	Apps, infra, DBs	Ensure retention and tagging
I5	Secrets Manager	Secure secret storage	CI, k8s, apps	Use RBAC and rotation
I6	Managed DB	Managed relational store	Apps, backups	Verify feature parity first
I7	Messaging	Queue/pub-sub service	Producers, consumers	Monitor lag and retention
I8	Load Balancer	Distributes traffic	DNS, k8s ingress	Handle TLS and sticky sessions
I9	CDNs	Edge caching and delivery	Origin services, auth	Use cache invalidation automation
I10	Policy/IAM	Access control for resources	All cloud services	Automate role provisioning
I11	Backup/Restore	Data protection tooling	DBs, object storage	Test restores regularly
I12	Cost Monitoring	Tracks cloud spend	Billing APIs, tagging	Set budgets and alerts
I13	Chaos/Testing	Resilience testing	CI, infra	Run scheduled experiments
I14	Service Mesh	Network-level features	k8s, telemetry	Adds sec and observability
I15	Operator Framework	Automates app lifecycle	k8s	Useful for stateful systems

Row Details (only if needed)

Not needed.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How do I decide between replatforming and refactoring?

Compare effort vs benefit: replatforming is lower code effort but changes infra; refactoring fixes internal code issues. Use SLO deficits and technical debt as deciding factors.

How long does a typical replatforming take?

Varies / depends.

How do I measure success after replatforming?

Use pre-defined SLIs/SLOs, deployment success rate, error budget usage, and cost per request.

What’s the difference between replatforming and rehosting?

Replatforming changes the runtime/platform with some optimization; rehosting moves unchanged workloads to new infrastructure.

What’s the difference between replatforming and modernizing?

Modernizing is an umbrella term; replatforming is a specific move to a different platform in that process.

What’s the difference between replatforming and refactoring?

Refactoring alters application internals; replatforming changes hosting/runtime with minimal code changes.

How do I reduce downtime during migration?

Use canaries, blue-green or traffic shifting, dual-write/dual-read, and validated cutover windows.

How do I migrate stateful services safely?

Use replication, snapshot-and-sync, dual-write patterns, and validation checksums.

How do I test a replatform before production?

Run a POC, synthetic tests, representative load tests, and chaos experiments.

How do I handle secrets during replatforming?

Map secrets to a managed secrets service, rotate keys, and avoid baking secrets into images.

How do I avoid vendor lock-in when replatforming?

Abstract cloud-specific calls via adapters and consider portability patterns like containers and standardized APIs.

How do I ensure compliance in replatforming?

Validate data residency, encryption, audit logs, and retention against regulatory requirements before migration.

How do I minimize cost spikes during migration?

Monitor cost per resource, avoid duplicate full-production environments long-term, and schedule non-critical tests outside billing peaks.

How do I prioritize services to replatform?

Prioritize by business impact, op-ex burden, incident frequency, and readiness for automation.

How do I automate rollback?

Add automated health checks and CD pipeline logic to revert to previous stable artifact when gates fail.

How do I keep teams aligned during replatforming?

Run regular migration cadence meetings, publish runbooks, and use shared dashboards for progress.

How do I migrate CI/CD itself?

Migrate CI jobs progressively, use artifact registries as contract, and ensure identical artifact outputs across pipelines.

How do I validate observability parity?

Compare metrics, traces, and logs across old and new platforms with side-by-side dashboards and synthetic tests.

---

Conclusion

Replatforming is a pragmatic, often high-impact strategy to modernize operations, reduce toil, and improve reliability without a full code rewrite. It fits between rehosting and rearchitecting and requires SRE discipline: careful telemetry, SLO-driven rollouts, staged migration patterns, and robust rollback automation. When done with clear measurement and automation, replatforming yields faster delivery and lower operational risk.

Next 7 days plan

• Day 1: Inventory services and capture baseline SLIs.
• Day 2: Choose target platform and design migration template.
• Day 3: Implement CI/CD pipeline updates and artifact registry.
• Day 4: Add or validate observability instrumentation for a pilot service.
• Day 5–7: Run POC canary, perform load validation, and update runbooks.

---

Appendix — Replatforming Keyword Cluster (SEO)

• Primary keywords
• Replatforming
• Replatform migration
• Application replatforming
• Cloud replatforming
• Replatform strategy
• Replatform vs refactor
• Replatform vs rehost
• Platform migration
• Replatforming guide

• Replatform best practices

• Related terminology

• Lift and shift
• Lift and improve
• Containerization migration
• Kubernetes migration
• PaaS migration
• Serverless migration
• Managed services migration
• DBaaS migration
• CI/CD migration

• Observability migration

• Operational keywords

• SLO driven migration
• SLI for replatforming
• Error budget and migration
• Canary deployment replatform
• Blue green deployment replatform
• Deployment rollback automation
• Migration runbook
• Migration automation
• Migration checklist

• Migration playbook

• Technical keywords

• Infrastructure as code migration
• Helm charts replatform
• Container image registry migration
• Secrets manager migration
• Network policy migration
• Stateful migration strategy
• Dual write migration
• Data replication migration
• Schema migration patterns

• Expand contract migration

• Observability keywords

• OpenTelemetry migration
• Metrics and traces migration
• Logging pipeline migration
• Prometheus migration
• Tracing migration
• Observability parity
• Synthetic tests for migration
• MTTD MTTM replatform
• SLO dashboards migration

• Canary metrics

• Security and compliance keywords

• IAM migration
• Secrets rotation migration
• Data residency migration
• Encryption migration
• Audit logs migration
• Compliance migration planning
• Least privilege replatform
• Vulnerability scanning migration
• Policy as code migration

• Access control mapping

• Cost and performance keywords

• Cost optimization replatform
• Cost per request calculation
• Autoscaling migration
• Spot instance migration
• Performance regression testing
• Latency optimization migration
• Resource requests and limits
• CPU memory profiling
• Cost monitoring migration

• Cost budgets and alerts

• Patterns and architectures

• Strangler pattern migration
• Strangler fig pattern
• Microservice migration
• Monolith to PaaS
• Microservice to k8s
• Serverless patterns for migration
• Operator pattern migration
• Service mesh adoption
• Edge CDN migration

• Messaging migration patterns

• Testing and validation keywords

• Load testing migration
• Chaos engineering migration
• Game days migration
• Canary validation tests
• Integration test migration
• Regression test migration
• Smoke tests migration
• End to end validation migration
• Acceptance test migration

• Soak tests migration

• Tooling keywords

• CI/CD tools for replatforming
• Artifact registry tools
• Prometheus for replatform
• Grafana dashboards migration
• Fluentd log migration
• OpenTelemetry collector migration
• Managed DB tools for migration
• Managed messaging migration
• Secrets manager tools

• Cloud provider migration tools

• Team and process keywords

• Platform engineering migration
• SRE migration playbook
• On-call migration procedures
• Runbook updates migration
• Stakeholder migration communication
• Migration governance
• Migration prioritization
• Migration ownership model
• Migration postmortem

• Migration training

• Long-tail phrases

• How to replatform an application to Kubernetes
• Step by step replatforming checklist
• Best practices for replatforming to serverless
• Migration strategies for legacy monoliths
• Replatforming monitoring and SLOs
• Replatforming runbook example
• Cost savings from replatforming case study
• Reducing toil with replatforming
• Replatforming database to managed service

• Replatforming CI pipelines to cloud

• Miscellaneous keywords

• Platform migration risks
• Migration rollback strategies
• Migration observability gaps
• Migration success criteria
• Migration decision framework
• Migration tooling matrix
• Migration pilot program
• Migration canary strategy
• Migration backlog management
• Migration telemetry comparison